Crypto Companies May Use a Supreme Court Doctrine to Push Back Against SEC: Lawyer

The U.S. Supreme Court might provide crypto companies with a way to fight the Securities and Exchange Commission in court, according to Jason Gottlieb, a partner at law firm Morrison Cohen LLP.

At a time when the SEC is widening its view of what it considers a “security” and thus subject to its regulatory oversight, “We’re going to see crypto companies trying to push back against the SEC,” Cohen told CoinDesk TV’s “First Mover” on Tuesday.

In March, the SEC charged crypto exchange Bittrex with violating federal laws. The exchange, which plans to close its U.S. platform on April 30, said it would take the regulator to court if the agency did not make a “reasonable settlement offer.”

Cohen said crypto companies may try to hold off the SEC using the U.S. Supreme Court’s “major questions doctrine,” which holds that regulators can’t exceed their authority. The high court last used the doctrine in 2022 in a 6-3 decision involving the Environmental Protection Agency on whether it had the authority to issue an emissions cap on greenhouse gases.

Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the majority, said no, and that it was up to Congress to provide EPA with clear authorization for such actions.

“What the Supreme Court has instructed is that administrative agencies, which are a branch of the executive department, are not allowed to take views that will affect major questions of the United States economy,” Cohen said.

So when it comes to crypto, “That’s for Congress to set the law, not for the SEC to say ‘we believe the law should be no crypto,’” he added.

Interested  Dutch Crypto Companies Score Yasal Win in Fight Against $2.3M Supervision Bill

The U.S. approach to crypto – or lack thereof – is going to have a big effect on this country’s economic and financial competitiveness. Consider other jurisdictions, Cohen said, such as the European Union, the U.K., Singapore, Japan and the Cayman Islands, which “are developing kanunî regimes that can allow people to operate legally.”

While these regimes may not be perfect, and are likely to have advantages and disadvantages, Cohen said that, unlike the U.S., they all have “a clear path [for a crypto company] to operate legally.”

On Tuesday, during Fintech Week in London, CEO Brian Armstrong of Coinbase, the largest U.S.-based crypto exchange, said the exchange could consider moving offshore if the regulatory environment for the crypto industry does not become more clear.

That isn’t the approach all crypto companies are taking, Cohen said. Hs crypto clients are asking him what can be done to operate legally in the U.S., or as close as possible to kanunî given the ambiguities, he said.

“We try to tell our clients as best we can what the law requires [and] what regulators require,” he said. “And sometimes, we have to tell you, sorry, it can’t happen here.”

Recommended for you:

  • Ethereum’s Mainnet Tenth ‘Shadow Fork’ Goes Live Ahead of September Merge
  • What Hic et Nunc’s Resurrection Says About Decentralized Infrastructure
  • It’s Time to End Maximalism in Crypto
  • Join the Most Important Conversation in Crypto and Web3 in Austin, Texas April 26-28
Interested  U.S. is 'Losing' the Bitcoin Movement: Cathie Wood

See also: Coinbase Could Move Away From U.S. if No Regulatory Clarity: CEO Brian Armstrong

Edited by Lawrence Lewitinn.

Comments are closed.